Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260662025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3784/2025 SMTI DEEPALI DEB AND ANR W/O- SRI. BHUMIDHAR RAMCHIARY 2: SMTI ARUNA SANGMA D/O-SRI. MOHIN SANGMA. BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF - VILLAGE- BALIPUKHURI TINIALI P.O P.S-TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ALI, MD. ANARUL ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 09.12.2025 Heard Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioners namely, (i) Smti. Deepali Deb (ii) Smti. Aruna Sangma, have prayed for bail in connection with NLP GRP P.S. Case No. 15/2025 under Section 61(2)/143(4) of BNS, 2023. 3. The petitioners are stated to have been detained in custody since 03.11.2025. 4. The allegation in the FIR dated 02.11.2025 lodged by one personal of Government Railway Police by alleging that he saw one girl crying in the station and upon asking her, the girl said that she has been forcefully taken to Arunachal Pradesh for selling to some person. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime, the case was transferred to Rangapara police station and re-registered as Rangapara P.S. Case No. 109/2025. 6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly submits that the case diary has been received where the statement of the victim girl under Section 183 BONSS recorded before the learned JMFC is also available and the victim girl has not implicated the present petitioners. 7. In the said facts and circumstances, the petitioners can be released on bail at this stage, subject to conditions. 8. Accordingly, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Rangapara P.S. Case No. 109/2025, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- each with one suitable surety each Page No.# 3/3 of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court(CJM, Sonitpur). 9. The direction for bail is further subject to the following conditions: (a) That the petitioners shall render cooperation with the remaining investigation; and (b) That the petitioners shall not hamper or tamper with evidence; 10. Violation or breach of any condition(s) shall entail cancellation of bail. 11. With the above observations, this bail petition stands allowed and disposed of accordingly. 12. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant