Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2598 (UTT)

MANISH BHATT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN

C482/239/2023 · 2025-04-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No.239 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Devendra Singh Bargali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the applicants. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. for the State/respondent no.1. 3. Ms. Radha Arya, Advocate for respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the parties have informed this Court that parties have settled the matter outside the Court and nothing remains to be decided in the present C482 application. 5. Accordingly, C482 application is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.04.2025 SK