MANISH BHATT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN
C482/239/2023 · 2025-04-09
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2598 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2598 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.239 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Devendra Singh Bargali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the applicants.
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. for the State/respondent no.1.
3. Ms. Radha Arya, Advocate for respondent no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the parties have informed this Court that parties have settled the matter outside the Court and nothing remains to be decided in the present C482 application.
5. Accordingly, C482 application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
09.04.2025 SK