Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25978 (AP)

Sri. Pendurthi Venkatesh, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/24401/2020 · 2025-08-31

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010367112020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24401/2020 Between: 1. SRI. PENDURTHI VENKATESH,, S/O. SRI. RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC EX. M.L.A., RAJANAGARAM, R/O. D. NO. 75-6-31, PRAKASH NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVARTHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE URBAN, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN, EAST ZONE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PRAKASH NAGAR POLICE STATION, EAST ZONE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN, PRAKASH NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or orders, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Impugned Notice, dt. 16.12.2020, U/Sec. 149 of Cr.P.C., to the Petitioner by the 2 Respondents as illegal, arbitrary, biased, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice, against the fundamental rights of the Constitution of India and violative of the Provisions of Cr.P.C., consequently Set-aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To suspend the Impugned Notice, dt. 16.12.2020, by the 3rd Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D S N V PRASAD BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or orders, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Impugned Notice, dt. 16.12.2020, U/Sec. 149 of Cr.P.C., to the Petitioner by the Respondents as illegal, arbitrary, biased, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice, against the fundamental rights of the Constitution of India and violative of the Provisions of Cr.P.C., consequently Set-aside the same and to pass...…” 2. Heard Sri DSNV Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.09.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 210 W.P.No.24401 of 2020 Dated.01.09.2025 MH