Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25975 (GAU)

M/S UNIQUE TRADERS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/6480/2025 · 2025-11-17

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010253672025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6480/2025 M/S UNIQUE TRADERS HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GHAGRAPAR, P.O. AND P.S. GHAGRAPAR, DISTRICT - NALBARI, ASSAM - 781369, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SARALA TALUKDAR. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPARTMENT, GROUND FLOOR, BLOCK-B, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781006. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (ROADS) PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI - 781003. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPARTMENT BILASIPARA CIVIL SUB DIVISION TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION DISTRICT - DHUBRI ASSAM Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. D Kalita Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. D Nath, Senior Govt. Advocate & Standing Counsel, PWD Page No.# 2/2 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 18.11.2025 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 14.11.2025, the petitioner could submit the photographic evidence in respect to package Nos.2 and 3 and have been duly issued the Site Verification Certificate. However, in respect to the package No.4, the petitioner could not submit the said photographic evidence and, as such, the petitioner now does not insist upon the Site Verification Certificate and accordingly, the learned counsel submits that the writ petition may be closed. 2. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the instant proceedings, for which, the writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant