APHC010366762020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24476/2020 Between: 1. PITTA RAMBABU,, S/O. PITTA APPALA NAIDU, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.7-228/1, 1ST FLOOR, SRI RAM NAGAR, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 3. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NORTH JONE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOPALAPATNAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY AND DISTRICT. 7. PITTA APPALA NAIDU, S/O. LATE PITTA TATAYYA, AGED 75 YEARS, R/O. GOLD AGE HOME, 41 MAP AVENUES, LALITHA SEA VIEW APARTMENTS, GL LAYOUT, HILL NO.1, APLLC IT JUNCTION, 2 PEDDA RISHI KONDA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 6th respondent at the instance of 7th respondent in repeatedly insisting petitioner to appear before his authority and yield to the terms of 7th respondent by giving up petitioner's claim under an agreement of sale cum Guarantee deed dated 02.02.2017 executed by 7th respondent connected to property consisting of Ground floor 1st floor vide D.No.7-228 and 22811 covered by Survey Number 14/4, Block No.3, which is constructed in an extent 250 Sq. yards or 209.033 Sq. yards or 209.033 Sq. meters, situate at Sri Ram Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam-27 in favour of 7th respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's life, liberty and property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 6th respondent not to insist petitioner to appear before his authority nor insist him to yield to the terms of 7th respondent, in connection with civil disputes concerning property consisting of Ground floor + 1st floor vide D.No.7-228 and 22811 covered by Survey Number 14/4, Block No.3, which is constructed in an extent 250 Sq. yards or 209.033 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 6th respondent at the instance of 7th respondent in repeatedly insisting petitioner to appear before his authority and yield to the terms of 7th respondent by giving up petitioner's claim under an agreement of sale cum Guarantee deed dated 02.02.2017 executed by 7th respondent connected to property consisting of Ground floor 1st floor vide D.No.7-228 and 22811 covered by Survey Number 14/4, Block No.3, which is constructed in an extent 250 Sq. yards or 209.033 Sq. meters, situate at Sri Ram Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam-27 in favour of 7th respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's life, liberty and property and pass...” 2. Heard Sri Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station frequently without there being registration of crime. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the subject matter is purely of a civil nature and the police are not interfering in the civil dispute. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being registration of any crime. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.09.2025 MH 5 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 246 W.P.No.24476 of 2020 Dt.01.09.2025 MH