Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25973 (JHR)

VIKASH RAY ALIAS VIKASH RAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9689/2024 · 2025-01-07

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8245 of 2024 ------ Saruk Ansari @ Shahrukh Ansari, aged about 22 years, S/o. Munna Ansari, R/o. Vill.- Banjhi, P.O.- Bara Banjhi, P.S.- Deodanr, Dist.- Godda. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B.A. No. 9689 of 2024 ------ Vikash Ray @ Vikash Rai, aged about 23 years, S/o. Badri Rai, R/o. Vill.- Nauwadih (Nwadeeha), P.O.- Bara Banjhi, P.S.- Deodanr, Dist.- Godda. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Purnendu Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. ------ 03/07.01.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Both these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, these bail applications are being disposed of by a common order. 3. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 247/2023 / S.T. Case No. 152/2024 arising out of Poraiyahat P.S. Case No. 83/2023, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 & 302 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge-III, Godda. 4. On 15.04.2023 at about 5:30 P.M., the petitioners alongwith co- accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the brother of the informant due to which he succumbed to his injuries. 5. It was submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and co-accused persons. It was further submitted that the informant has not seen the occurrence, he had only seen the accused persons fleeing away from the place of occurrence. It was finally submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 6. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners but does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 7. In view of the submissions made above, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge-III, Godda in connection with S.T. Case No. 247/2023 / S.T. Case No. 152/2024 arising out of Poraiyahat P.S. Case No. 83/2023. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/-