Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25973 (GAU)

SHAJEDUL KARIM SARKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Crl.Pet./126/2021 · 2025-12-17

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010032972021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./126/2021 SHAJEDUL KARIM SARKAR S/O A.K.M ISLAM SARKAR, R/O WARD NO. 4, P.S.-GAURIPUR, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:ANOWARA BEGUM W/O LATE ABU BAKKAR SIDDIK R/O WARD NO. 4 KOLABAGAN GAURIPUR P.S.-GAURIPUR DIST-DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. A AHMED,U U KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MD R ISLAM,S K DAS,MR D N SARMA Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 18.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1. 2. The learned counsels for both the parties have submitted that that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties out of the court and they do not want to proceed any further to continue with the current issue. They do not want to persue the litigation. 3. Moreover, the learned counsel for the parties also submitted in unision that the following portion reflected in the judgment and Order dated 09.12.2020, passed in Criminal Revision No. 29/2020 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhubri ………”Send back the case record of G.R. Case No. 2219/2020 to the learned trial Court alongwith copy of this judgment. The learned Trial Court is directed to take necessary steps by fixing liability, if any one is found guilty of playing fraud with the order of the Court and pass necessary order on the petition of the revision petitioner as per the provisions of law” require interference, accordingly, it is provided that the execution of the said portion of the order shall not be acted upon by the learned trial Court. 4. With the above observation and on the prayer of the learned counsel for Page No.# 3/3 both the parties, this revision petition is closed on consent of the parties. JUDGE Comparing Assistant