Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25971 (MAD)

The Management v. Joint commissioner of Labour

WP/5367/2023 · 2025-06-30

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.5367 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 30.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 5367 of 2023 & W.M.P.No. 5392 of 2023 The Management, Hatsun Agro Product Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory No.1 A, Sengam Pasuvanthula Village, Veppalahalli Post, Palakodu, Dharmapuri – 636805. ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Joint Commissioner of Labour, Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1st Floor, Near Employment Office, Gorimedu, Salem – 636 008. 2.Dharmapuri District Milk Industries Workers Union, 2D, Narasimhan Street, BSNL Office backside, Dharmapuri – 636 701. ...Respondents 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5367 of 2023 Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in IA.No.3 of 2022 and quash its order dated 10.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Ravindran Senior Counsel For Mr. S.Bazeerahamed For Respondent 1: Mr. M.Murali Government Advocate For Respondent 2: Mrs. V.Porkodi For Mr. V.Ajay Khose O R D E R The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “To call for the records of the 1st respondent in IA.No.3 of 2022 and quash its order dated 10.02.2023.” 2. Contending that the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition does not spell out any reasons and there is no evidence to prove the reasons for the delay, the management is before this Court. The argument is that without reasons and evidence the authority below condoned the delay which clearly indicates the non-application of 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5367 of 2023 mind. 3. A reading of the affidavit and the order does indicate the reasons for seeking condonation. It has been time and again reiterated by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court that condoning the delay is not automatic and the person seeking condonation has to give sufficient reasons. 4. Therefore, the interest of justice would be sub served if the matter is remitted back to the 1st respondent for a fresh consideration. The 2nd respondent shall file a better affidavit containing more particulars and both parties are permitted to let in evidence. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 30.06.2025 Index : Yes/No 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5367 of 2023 Internet : Yes/No kan To Joint Commissioner of Labour, Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1st Floor, Near Employment Office, Gorimedu, Salem – 636 008. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5367 of 2023 P.T. ASHA, J, kan W.P.No. 5367 of 2023 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5367 of 2023 30.06.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis