SMT. JAYAMMA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MSA/143/2018 · 2025-03-20
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25971 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25971 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:37242 MSA No. 143 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO.143 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. JAYAMMA W/O MANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT HOOVINAHALLI VILLAGE KUPPALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT PIN 573217 …APPELLANT (BY SRI HANUMANTHAPPA.B, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PROJECT-II DC. OFFICE BUILDING HASSAN CITY, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 201.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT DC. OFFICE, HASSAN CITY, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT PIN:573201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.P.MALIPATIL, AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
VIDE ORDER DATED 31.08.24 SRI PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2024:KHC:37242 MSA No. 143 of 2018
THIS MSA IS FILED U/S 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12.01.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.418/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.08.2005 PASSED IN L.A.C.NO.25/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Case called twice. None appears for the appellant. Amendment to the cause title not carried out. Amended appeal memo is also not filed. There is a delay of 1349 days in filing the appeal. Second appeal itself is of the year 2018, whereby the order of the First Appellate Court enhancing the compensation is under challenge. Taking note of these aspects of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3