The Regional Manager vs. Roop Singh and another CMP(M) No. 1682 of 2025 22.09.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate, for respondent No.1 CMP No. 23126 of 2025 For the sufficient cause shown, delay in refilling the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CMP(M) No. 1682 of 2025 Non-applicant/proforma respondent No.2 was the driver of the HRTC Bus, which was owned by the present applicant/appellant. The interest of proforma respondent No.2 lies with the applicant/appellant. No liability has been fastened on the proforma respondent No.2 (driver). The entire liability has been fastened on the applicant i.e. owner of the bus in the case at hand. For the sufficient cause shown, delay of five days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO No. _____ of 2025 On taking steps within three days, issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable within four weeks. Admit. Call for the records. List for hearing in due course. CMP No. ____ of 2025 Operation/execution of impugned award dated 28.11.2024 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr H.P. in CIS Regd. No. 18/2020 titled as Roop Singh vs. HRTC and another shall remain stayed subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks. Application stands disposed of. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge September 22, 2025 tarun