1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1457 of 2013 1 - Suraj Computers Lailunga Proprietor Smt. Bulbul Agrawal, W/o Shri Rohit Agrawal, Age 36 Yrs, R/o Surajmukhi 58, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Ps Sarkanda, Distt Bilaspur, Cg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - C.G. State Through The Secretary Through The Secretary Higher Education Mahanadi Mantralaya, New Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Aisect Computer Directorate Aisect Computers, E- 8/54, Bharat Nagar, Near Shivam, Super Bazar, Bhopal, Mp, District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 3 - Dr. C.V.Raman University Raipur C-18, Sector-1, Avanti Vihar, Mahasamund Road, Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - D.E.O. Raigarh, School Education, Distt Raigarh, Cg, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - D.E.O. Jashur School Education, Distt Jashpur, Cg, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The School Principal, Govt. High Secondary School, Lailunga, Distt Raigarh, Cg, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 7 - The School Principal. Govt. Higher Secondary School, Lailunga, Distt Raigarh, Cg, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 8 - The School Principal.. Govt. High School Chhagarpur, Distt Raigarh, Cg, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 9 - The School Principal.. Govt. High School Kodasia, Distt Raigarh, Cg, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 10 - The School Principal Govt. High School Ghatgoan, Distt Raigarh, Cg, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 11 - The School Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Mukdega, Distt Raigarh, Cg , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 12 - The School Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kotba, Distt Jashpur, Cg, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Ravindra Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Shri H.V. Sharma, Advocate. For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Shri Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17.04.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following reliefs: “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition. 10.2 Kindly direct to respondents to pay the petitioner after all amount 427442/- Rupees (Four Lack twenty seven thousand and four hundred forty two) rupees only with interest of 18% from 2003. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deem fit may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that there is an arbitration clause in the agreement entered into between the petitioner and respondents No.6 to 12. They would submit that the writ petition is not maintainable. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to 3 approach the arbitrator according to clause 35 of the agreement. The prayer made by counsel for the petitioner appears to be reasonable. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach the arbitrator according to Clause 35 of the agreement. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi