Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
118
CWP-27793-2025
Date of Decision: 20.01.2026
SARDARA
......PETITIONER
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
It is clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we have neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability/entertainability of the remedy that the petitioner may invoke in terms of the liberty granted through the instant order.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
20.01.2026
[LAPITA BANERJI] Prince
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No
PRINCE SAINI 2026.01.21 03:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document