Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25968 (PNJ)

HARSIMAR KAUR MINOR THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND NARESH KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/1659/2025 · 2025-09-03

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 225 Harsimar Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners as against the wishes of their family members. 2. way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police (City), District Ferozepur, as per which the petitioner got her statement recorded that she has solemnized marriage with respondent No.2 they do not have 3. passed and, as such, the present petition stands disposed of. 03.09.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Harsimar Kaur Minor Through Her Next Friend Naresh Kumar Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHAR None for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners as against the wishes of their family members. Learned State counsel refers to para 5 of way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police (City), District Ferozepur, as per which the petitioner got her statement recorded that she has solemnized marriage with respondent No.2 they do not have any threat perception. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed and, as such, the present petition stands disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-1659-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 03.09.2025 Minor Through Her Next Friend Naresh Kumar ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners as they are in a ‘live-in’ against the wishes of their family members. rned State counsel refers to para 5 of status report filed by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police (City), District Ferozepur, as per which the petitioner got her statement recorded that she has solemnized marriage with respondent No.2; of her own consent and In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed and, as such, the present petition stands disposed of. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.04 19:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.