1 APHC010367802016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31102/2016 Between: K.surya Prakash ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. N NIRMAL KUMAR 3. S DUSHYANTH REDDY The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus delcaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in not acknowleding the continuance of the petitioner beyond the age of 58 years by virtue of 2 refixation of age of superannuation done by the 3rd respondent as per the Memo No 5825/Coop III/20147 dated 23.05.2015 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondent No.2 to acknowledge and accept the continunace of the petitioner as Managing Director of the 3rd respondent and to pass...” 2. Sri Madala Sai Teja, learned counsel representing Sri N. Madhava Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 11.07.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.31102 of 2016 11.07.2025 ASR