Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25966 (KAR)

MANCHAIAH v. SMT.H.M.ANNAPOORNA

RSA/1234/2021 · 2025-06-25

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22224 RSA No. 1234 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1234 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. MANCHAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT. RADHA W/O LATE MANCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A HULIVANA VILLAGE KERAGODU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571401 …APPELLANT (BY SRI K N NITISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K V NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. H.M.ANNAPOORNA W/O M K MURALIDHARA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A 2ND CROSS, NEHRU NAGAR MANDYA CITY 571401 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.09.2018 Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22224 RSA No. 1234 of 2021 PASSED IN R.A.No.32/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MANDYA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant files a memo of retirement along with the postal cover which was returned with an endorsement ‘addressee not found’. 2. This appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of both the Courts wherein the Trial Court dismissed the suit and the First Appellate Court also confirmed the judgment of the Trial Court. 3. This appeal is of the year 2021 and till date, office objections are not complied. In terms of the memo and in view of non-compliance of office objections and this appeal is against the concurrent finding of both the Courts, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN