Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18589 WP No. 13561 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 13561 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. NAGARAJA P.V, S/O VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
2.
MUNIRAJA P.V S/O. VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING R/AT:
PALYA VILLAGE, NAGANAYAKANAHALLI, CHANNATAYAPATNA HOBLI, BENGALURU RURAL - 562 135. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARAN N.MAJAGE, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
2.
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18589 WP No. 13561 of 2025
3.
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 20.02.2025 AND 19.09.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND A1.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Petitioners are before this court seeking the following prayers:
"a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.3 to consider the Representation of the Petitioners dated 20.02.2025 and 19.09.2024 as per ANNEXURE-A & A1; and b. Issue such other order or direction, this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstance of the case in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The property of the petitioners is said to have been acquired in the year 2018 and the petitioners have gone on
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18589 WP No. 13561 of 2025
submitting representations for grant of compensation for the said acquisition. The non-consideration of the representation has driven the petitioners to this court in the subject petition.
3.
Learned counsel Sri.H.L.Pradeep kumar appearing for the respondent No.3 submits that if reasonable time is granted, the representation would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed, in accordance with law.
4. In that light, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition without deeper dwelling into the matter with a direction to respondent No.3 to dispose the representation within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and communicate the order so passed by the 3rd respondent to the petitioners.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT: BHK