IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 699 of 2024. Decided on : 28 th June , 2025. Deepa Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus Rishabh Sarswati ....Respondent. Coram:The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Poonam Gehlot, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Respondent in person. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not visit Shimla for attending the Court on account of forth coming examination of her daughter. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to certain defects in the petition, he wants to withdraw it with liberty to file afresh. Prayer is not opposed. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 28th June, 2025. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?