Cont.P.No.732 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Cont.P.No.732 of 2025 Swami Karshni Anubhavanand ... Petitioner Versus 1.Kothandam 2.Jayanthi 3.Manikandan 4.Venkatesan 5.A.Shanmugham 6.P.S.Mani 7.R.Vimala 8.S.Kumari 9.S.Saradammal 10.P.Perumal (Died) 11.P.Parvathi 12.D.Danalakshmi (Died) 13.N.Arumugham 14.K.Veerasami 15.K.Arumugham 16.Senthil Kumar 17.T.Divakar 18.V.Arumugham 19.K.Sekar 20.K.Senthil Kumar 21.M.Mangalakshmi (Died) 22.Poongavanammal 23.M.Seenu sa 24.A.Abdul Rashid (Died) 25.K.Nagammal 26.K.G.Subramani Sa 27.Lakshmi 28.S.Varadappa Chettiar 29.Deivani Ammal 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.732 of 2025 30.K.Rajeswari Ammal 31.Lalith Bai (Died) 32.Rajammal (Died) 33.V.Marks 34.Syed Ahamad 35.Pitchaiammal 36.Gowri 37.Santhanam 38.R.Sakunthala (Died) 39.Roja Bai (Died) 40.Soundarapandiyan (Died) 41.Delli Babu 42.Baggialakshmi 43.N.G.Chandrasekaran 44.N.G.Iyyappan 45.Lakshmi Bai 46.N.Perumal 47.P.Parvathy 48.Indirakumar 49.P.Venkatesan 50.P.Gomathy 51.P.Sudhakar 52.P.Banumathy 53.S.Karpagam 54.Uma Maheswari 55.Lavanya 56.Janathanan 57.A.Dilshaad Begum 58.A.Shabeer Ahamed 59.A.Kalitha Begum 60.Kandasamy 61.Jawaharlal Sha 62.Kuppusamy Sha 63.Sundar Sha 64.Chandra Mohan 65.V.C.Rangan 66.A.Priya 67.Raji 68.Latha 69.Kumar 70.R.Vijaya 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.732 of 2025 71.R.Loganathan 72.S.Mallika 73.Manoranjitham 74.Punniyakotti 75.Devi 76.S.Vanii .. Respondents (Contempt closed against the 12th respondent as per the order of this Court in Cont.P.No.732/2025 dated 28.03.2025) Prayer: Contempt Petition filed section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of this Court by disobeying the order in CRP.No.2686/2009 dated 11.12.2024. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Priyanga for Mr.M.Muruganantham For Respondent : Mr.K.M.Haresh for RR2 to 4, 7, 8, 16 to 18, 22, 30, 33, 35, 37, 41 to 45, 46, 64 to 67, 69, 73, 74 & 76 ORDER This contempt petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of this Court by disobeying the order in CRP.No.2686/2009 dated 11.12.2024. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that copy of the lease agreement signed is required for their purposes. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the copy will be provided to them. Such statement is recorded. N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.732 of 2025 3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that respondents 2 to 4, 7, 8, 16 to 18, 22, 30, 33, 35, 37, 41 to 45, 46, 64 to 67, 69, 73, 74 & 76 have preferred Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP.(Civil).D.No.2837 of 2025 as against the order daed 11.12.2024. The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 15.09.2025 directed the parties to maintain status quo with respect to the nature of the subject property pending disposal of the SLP. This Court also perused the order dated 15.09.2025. 4. Such view of the matter, this contempt is closed for the present. 25.09.2025 Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No dhk Cont.P.No. 732 of 2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis