Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2596 (UTT)

ANKITA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/102/2025 · 2025-04-30

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.102 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Harsh Taneja, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuli, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after investigation a final report has been submitted on 13.03.2025. 4. The said fact is also confirmed by learned State counsel. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 30.04.2025 SK