Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2596 (BOM)

RAJESH S/O. PANJABRAO DESHKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

WP/303/2025 · 2026-08-19

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Order wp 303.2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 303 of 2025 [Shri Rajesh s/o Panjabrao Deshkar vs. The State of Maharashtra, through the General Administrative Department and ors.] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. M. Bhangde with Mr. S. S. Shinde, Advocates for the petitioner Mr. A. V. Palshikar, AGP for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. D. R. Bhoyar, Advocates for respondent nos. 3 and 4 CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : 19-08-2026. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no. 4 – Chief Executive Officer, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the statement made in the affidavit dated 3-8-2026 which indicates that the respondents will be bound by the Government Resolutions and not by the law laid down by the High Court. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader and learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 and 4 jointly make a statement that petitioner’s candidature along with notional appointment for the purpose of seniority will be considered in terms of law laid down by this Court in the cases of (1) Bhavya Nain Vs. High Court (AIR ONLINE 220 DEL 671), (2) The State of 2026:BHC-NAG:10792-DB Order wp 303.2025.odt 2 Maharashtra Vs. Vishal Ashok Dhole (W.P. No. 689/2025) and (3) Arpit Kumar Bhana Vs. Union Bank of India and others (W.P. No. 22228/2023). The statement is accepted. 4. Necessary steps shall be taken within three weeks from today. 5. The petitioner is satisfied with this development as purpose of filing petition has been served. The petition is accordingly disposed in terms of above. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) wasnik Signed by: Mr. A. Y. Wasnik Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2026 14:25:35