Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25957 (KAR)

SRI VINOD KUMAR PUTHUSEERI v. SMT RESHMA VINOD

CRL.RP/689/2025 · 2025-06-10

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19708 CRL.RP No. 689 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 689 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI VINOD KUMAR PUTHUSEERI S/O LATE N RAMANCHADRAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O: No.741/D, DEVAKI NILAYAM DEVAKI NILAYAM, OPP. OM RESIDENCY 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS ‘B’ BLOCK VINAYAKA NAGARA BENGALURU -560 017. …PETITIONER (BY SRI A M VIJAY, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. RESHMA VINOD W/O VINOD KUMAR PUTHUSEERI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/O NO.302, ‘B’ BLOCK OM RESIDENCY APARTMENT 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS ‘B’ BLOCK VINAYAKA NAGARA BENGALURU – 560 017. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXXIV ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.25244/2024 DATED 05.04.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE -E AND THEREBY DISMISS THE I.A FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTIONS 19 AND 23 OF THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT BY Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19708 CRL.RP No. 689 of 2025 THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, TRAFFIC COURT- I, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU, IN CRL.MISC No.107/2023 AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads thus: “The Petitioner seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above Revision Petition in view of the bar under Section 397(2) of Cr.P.C. and liberty may be reserved to the Petitioner for filing appropriate Petition before this Hon’ble Court by invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C., challenging the impugned orders of the Trial Court and the Sessions Court.” In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Registry is directed to return the documents to the petitioner. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48