Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010232312025 2025:GAU-AS:14804 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3400/2025 MUKUT RANJAN SARMAH S/O HOMESWAR SARMAH, RESIDENT OF NONOI URIA GAON, PO NONOI, PS SADAR, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM 782101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM 3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT NAGAON CIRCLE DIST NAGAON ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT NAGAON ASSAM 5:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT NAGAON DIVISION DIST NAGAON Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM 6:THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER MINISTRY OF JALASHAKTI DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES RIVER DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA RENOVATION NEW DELHI 110001 7:THE BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD ASSAM REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN BASISTHA GUWAHATI 781029 8:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( AUDIT) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON KRISHNANAGAR BELTOLA GUWAHATI 78102 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI, MR. T K BORA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE, MRS. A GAYAN (C.G.C),SC, AG (A AND E),DY.S.G.I. Linked Case : WP(C)/5520/2024 MUKUT RANJAN SARMAH S/O HOMESWAR SARMAH RESIDENT OF NONOI URIA GAON PO NONOI PS SADAR DIST NAGAON ASSAM 782101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM 3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT NAGAON CIRCLE DIST NAGAON ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT NAGAON ASSAM 5:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT NAGAON DIVISION DIST NAGAON ASSAM ------------ Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. KR Patgiri Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. A Gayan, CGC B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 01.11.2025 Heard Mr. KR Patgiri, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Page No.# 4/4 applicant. 2. This is an application filed by the applicant, who is the petitioner in WP(C)No.5520/2024 seeking impleadment of the opposite party Nos.6, 7 and 8 to the accompanying writ petition on the ground that a scheme under which the petitioner seeks recovery of the amount from the respondents is a scheme of the respondent Nos.6 and 7. 3. Taking into account the above, it is the opinion of this Court that the opposite party Nos.6, 7 and 8 ought to be arrayed as respondents in the accompanying writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the opposite party Nos.6,7 and 8 are arrayed as respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8 to the accompanying writ petition. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within seven days from today and the Registry on the basis of the instant order shall make the necessary correction in the cause-title and update the same in the CIS. 6. Interlocutory application, accordingly, stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant