Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25948 (RAJ)

CHITRA DUTT W/O SURESH MALI D/O PREM DUTT B/C MALI v. SURESH MALI S/O MANGILAL

CRLR/1633/2019 · 2025-08-07

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30437] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1387/2019 Suresh Mali S/o Sh. Mangi Lal, R/o Vill. Bassi Ps Todaraisingh Dist. Tonk At Present At Present R/o D-301 Prahlad Park Behind Satyamev Hospital Chandkheda Ahmedabad (Guj.) ----Petitioner Versus Chitra Datt W/o Sh. Suresh Mali D/o Sh. Premdatta B/c Mali, Aged About 35 Years, At Present House No 61/27 Tekri Ke Upar Jaunsganj Ajmer Raj. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1633/2019 Chitra Dutt W/o Suresh Mali D/o Prem Dutt B/c Mali, At Present R/o House No. 61/27, Above Tekdi Near Raamleela Ground, Jossganj, Ajmer Raj. ----Petitioner Versus Suresh Mali S/o Mangilal, R/o Gram Bassi Police Station Todaraisingh Distt. Tonk Raj. Presently Residing R/o D-301, Prahlad Park, Behind Satyamev Hospital Chandkhera, Ahmadabad Gujrat. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajaram Chaudhary Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/08/2025 Heard on IA No. 1/2025. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:30437] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1387/2019] Learned counsel for the both the parties submits that they have amicably settled the matrimonial dispute and now they do not want to pursue their revision petition. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, both the revision petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/42-43