Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010273292025 2025:GAU-AS:17176 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2911/2025 NASIRUDDIN SK ALIAS NASIRUDDIN AHMED AND 3 ORS. S/O TAHER ALI, R/O VILL JHAPUSABARI PT II, AGOMONI, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM 2: NAZMUL HOQUE S/O TAHER ALI R/O VILL JHAPUSABARI PT II AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 3: RASIDUL HOQUE S/O NASIYAT ALI R/O VILL JHAPUSABARI PT II AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 4: KHAIRUL HOQUE S/O NASIYAT ALI R/O VILL JHAPUSABARI PT II AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ, MD A RAHMAN,MR. A TARAFDAR,A Page No.# 2/4 MISHRA,MR. SURAJIT DAS,MR A W AMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS O R D E R 11.12.2025 Heard Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Nasiruddin Sk @ Nasiruddin Ahmed, Nazmul Hoque, Rasidul Hoque and Khairul Hoque, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Agomoni P.S. Case No.152/2025 under Sections 61(2), 109(2), 117(2), 118(2), 304(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. The petitioner is stated to have been detained in custody since 12.11.2025. 3. There are ten persons named in the FIR including the petitioner. The FIR dated 09.11.2025 lodged by one Nazrul Hoque with allegation that on the same day, when his three nephews were plaguing a plot of land, the FIR named accused persons attacked them including stick, bamboos and sharp weapons with intend to kill and cause assault. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner drawing my attention to the order dated 08.12.2025 passed by this Court on 08.12.2025 in Bail Appln. 3719/2025 submits that this Court was pleased to grant regular bail to one co-accused Page No.# 3/4 under similar circumstances and also drawn attention to para-5 of the said order. 5. The learned Addl. P.P. submits that the investigation is not yet complete. It was observed in the said aforesaid order on the basis of the case diary and the submission of the prosecution that while the eye witnesses have stated about involvement of all the FIR named accused persons, the medical report has revealed simple injury in one case and grievous injury caused by blunt weapon in another (laceration in frontal region). 6. There is learned counsel makes a similar submission that in the context of these circumstances, the facts could perhaps may cause a bailable offence. 7. This reasonable progress in investigation. Considering that aspect and aforesaid aspect regarding the medical report and also the bail (though regular bail) granted to the co-accused – I though it fit allow this petition. 8. Accordingly, the accused persons are hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs. 30,000/- each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court and subject to the following conditions that:- (i) That the accused persons shall co-operate with the remaining investigation, (ii) That the accused persons shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. (iii) That the petitioners shall not intimidate or harass the informant or his family members, 9. Violation of any bail conditions will entail cancellation of the bail. 10. This anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. 11. Send back the case diary. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant