Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25942 (RAJ)

MANBAI WIDOW OF LATE SHRI LOHARE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WRES/483/2025 · 2025-08-11

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30944] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 483/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6539/2022 Manbai Widow Of Late Shri Lohare, Resident Of Keshavpura, Karauli District Karauli. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Water Resources, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretriat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary Finance (Insurance) Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretriat, Jaipur. 3. Chief Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Jyoti Na- gar, Jaipur. 4. Executive Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Di- vision Karauli, District Karauli. 5. Executive Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Di- vision Dholpur, District Dholpur. 6. Assistant Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Sub- Division Karauli, District Karauli. 7. Assistant Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Sub- Division Dholpur. 8. Assistant Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Sub- Division Srimadhopur Ji, District Karauli. 9. Senior Additional Director (Vigilance), State Insurance And Provident Fund Depaetment, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order [2025:RJ-JP:30944] (2 of 2) [WRES-483/2025] 11/08/2025 Instant restoration application has been filed for restoring S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6539/2022 which was initially dismissed on account of non-compliance of the peremptory order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.10.2023. Heard and considered the facts of the case. For the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6539/2022 is restored to its original number. The office is directed to proceed further. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/2