[2025:RJ-JP:29001] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9603/2025 1. Munna @ Tofeek @ Computer S/o Shri Salim Suleman, Aged About 23 Years, R/o House No. 140, Sanjay Nagar, Ps Bhatta Basti, District Jaipur North. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2. Asif Khan S/o Shri Sabir, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House No. 482, Bhomiya Ji Ki Basti, Ps Bhatta Basti, District Jaipur North. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 3. Shahrukh @ Mota S/o Mohammad Haneef, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kureshiyo Ka Mohalla, Sajnabaad, Gulabpura, Ps-Gulabpura, District Bhilwara, Presently Tenant Sabbir Bhia Ka Makan, Gota Factory, Surajpol Bazar Ps- Ram- ganj, Jaipur North. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.P. Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.87/2025 registered at Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur (West) for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS. After completion of investigation, charge- sheet has been filed. [2025:RJ-JP:29001] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9603/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate for which maximum term of sentence is three years. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that petitioners are habitual offenders as several other cases have been registered against them. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate for which maximum term of sentence is three years; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Munna @ Tofeek @ Computer S/o Shri Salim Suleman 2) Asif Khan S/o Shri Sabir & 3) Shahrukh @ Mota S/o Mohammad Haneef shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand [2025:RJ-JP:29001] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9603/2025] Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /376