1 2025:CGHC:23520 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4272 of 2025 1 - Balmukund Sahu S/o Shriram Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Infront Of Electricity Office Gadiyapara Chhura, Block And Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate of Public Instruction Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer and Secretary District Rationalization Committee District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer Block- Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Head Master, Government Primary School Kunderdadar, Block- Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Kirpesh G. Kela, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General along with Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate and Mr. Suyash Dhar, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 11-06-2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner and he has already joined on transferred place of posting, but on 06-06-2025 the authorities has directed to transfer the DDO of the petitioner to the transferred place. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner has been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. He would further submit that if the petitioner is having any grievance, he may move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee by 13th June, 2025 and appear before the said Committee on 17th June, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner within seven days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil