Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2594 (UTT)

DEEPAK JALAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/276/2025 · 2025-03-05

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1533 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/276/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ayush Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddharath Bisht, learned Assistant Government Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant is seeking bail in relation to FIR dated 28.11.2024 bearing FIR No. 0060 of 2024, registered at Police Station – Bhowali, District – Nainital wherein present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 324 (5), 326 (g), 351 (3) BNS read with Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and has no previous criminal history and charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation. 5. Apart from this, he further submits that the alleged recovery of the country made pistol shown to be recovered from the applicant is after taking the applicant into custody and it is planted one and applicant is languishing in jail 27.11.2024. 6. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has not disputed that charge-sheet has already been filed and there is no need of custodial interrogation and furthermore, the applicant has no previous criminal history. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation and applicant has not criminal history, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Deepak Jalal” be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two 2025:UHC:1533 sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that the applicant shall cooperate with the trial and shall not take any adjournment in the trial. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 05.03.2025 SKS