Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25939 (CHH)

GANGA MACHHUWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, BHANWARMAL, v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPC/3604/2021 · 2025-04-03

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15696 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3604 of 2021 • Ganga Machhuwa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Bhanwarmal, Balrampur, Through Its President, Kalika Singh, S/o Late Bhulan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, Caste Khairwar (Scheduled Tribe), Village Bhanwarmal, Post Chandranagar, Police Station Ramanujganj, District Balrampur – Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Fisheries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Directorate, Fisheries Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Assistant Director, Fisheries Department, Balrampur - Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 4. Collector, District Balrampur – Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur – Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 6. Unnat Machhuwa Sahakari Samiti, Village Kamalpur, District Balrampur – Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondents No. 1, 2 and 4/State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 19.08.2021 (Annexure P/7) and further restrained the respondent No. 6 for fishing. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti