Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25934 (RAJ)

SAJJAN KUMAR v. REGISTAR GENERAL RAJ HIGH COURT

CW/2378/2016 · 2025-03-26

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13744] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2378/2016 Sajjan Kumar Son Of Late Shri Gokul Chand, aged about 44 years, resident of Ward No. 2, Talab Ka Mohalla, Walmiki Basti, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Registrar General, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur Raj. 2. The District Judge, District Jhunjhunu Raj. 3. The Additional District Judge, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu Raj. 4. The Civil Judge, Sr. Division And Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu Raj. 5. The Munsif And Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 26/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on account of recent pronouncement of judgment in Jaggo vs. Union of India reported in 2024 INSC 1034, learned counsel wants to file a fresh representation raising his grievance and consideration thereof in the light of the directions encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ- JP:5792) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:13744] (2 of 2) [CW-2378/2016] Considering the limited prayer made by the learned counsel, it is directed that the petitioner is granted a liberty to file a fresh representation within a period of 7 days from the date of passing of this order and the same be disposed of by way of a speaking order, by the respondents within a period of 30 days thereafter in light of the directions spelled out in Pawan Meena (Supra) and the circular dated 19.02.2024. Additionally, a liberty is given to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum, if need so arise in future. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/199