Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25933 (AP)

B.Narasimha Reddy, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17942/2019 · 2025-08-18

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010367742019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17942/2019 Between: 1. B.NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O LATE GANGI REDDY, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.5-85/A, PACHIKAPALLAM, EDURUKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PCEI.ZENUE DEPARTMENT, SECREATARIAT BUILDINGS AMARAVATHI, 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VEDURU KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE PACHIKAPALLAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PACHIKAPALLEM, VEDURU KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in failing to consider the representation of the petitioner, dt.13.03.2019 for release of the water .777. submitted by the petitioner for the period June 2018 to September 2018. Inspite of supply of water tanks to the villagers through 2 his tractor as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutior al and consequentially direct the respondents to forth with consider the representation of the petitioner submitted to the respondents 2 to 4 dated 13.3.2019 for release of pending water bills pertaining to the petitioner for the village at Pachikapallam, Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forth with consider the representation of the petitioner submitted to the respondents 2 to 4 dated 13.3.2019 for release of pending water bills pertaining to the petitioner for the village at Pachikapallam, Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V VINOD K REDDY 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17942/2019 ORDER: The petitioner did not appear on any of the occasions i.e., on 02.01.2020, 19.12.2024 and 11.08.2025 and the matter was posted for dismissal. Even though the matter was posted to today for dismissal, none appeared. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 19.08.2025 TTPPSS 4 180 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17942/2019 19.08.2025 TTPPSS 5