Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2593 (AP)

RANJEETH KUMAR RAVISHETTY v. RAVISHETTY @ PERALA KAVITHA

CRP/36/2024 · 2025-07-10

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010004342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 36/2024 Between: 1. RANJEETH KUMAR RAVISHETTY, RANJEETH KUMAR RAVISHETTY S/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE IN HAL (HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICAL LIMITED) AND R/O P.N. NO. 83425, HAL, BARRACPORE DIVISIONO, TOPKHANA RAOD, KOLKATA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. RAVISHETTY PERALA KAVITHA, ravishetty @ Perala Kavitha, W/o R.Ranjeeth Kumar, Aged about 39 years, Occ-Business, R/0 H.No.3-7- 35/1, Vittalnagar, Near Rama Temple, Perala, Chirala Mandal, Bapatla District, Now R/o Ongole. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topetitioner beg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the orders dt-24.11.2023 made in LA.No.l277 of 2022 in FCOP. No.38 of 2023 on the file of Family Court-Cum-VIl Additional District Judge, Ongole, IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in LA.No.l277 of 2022 in 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.36 of 2024 FCOP. No.38 of 2023 on the file of Family Court-Cum—^VII Additional District Judge, Ongole, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATHEESH KUMAR EERLA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CHIRANJEEVI TANIKONDA 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.36 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date:11.07.2025 KPV 4 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.36 of 2024 333 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:36 of 2024 11.07.2025 KPV