-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 942 of 2024 1. Pushpa Sahagal, aged about 63 years, Wife of Dr. Kaushal Lal Sahagal, residents of Dipua Mohalla in front of Town Hall, P.O., P.S. and District Garhwa. 2. Dr. Kaushal Lal Sahagal, aged about 64 Years Son of Late Prasidh Narain Singh residents of Dipua Mohalla in front of Town Hall, P.Ο., P.S. and District Garhwa. ..... … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa, P.O. and P.S. Garhwa District Garhwa. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Garhwa, P.O., P.S. and District Garhwa. 4. Circle Officer, Garhwa, P.O., P.S. and District Garhwa. 5. Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Son of name not known to the petitioner resident of H64, Argora Housing Colony Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 6. Punjab National Bank, Daltonganj, Main Bazar, Daltonganj, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj District Palamau. ..... … Respondents -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. K.K. Bhatt, A.C. to S.C.-I. For the Resp. No. 5 : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate. For the Resp. No. 6 (Bank): Mr. D.K. Bharti, Advocate. ------ 03/ 03.01.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 and learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 6 Bank. 2. This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 29.08.2024, passed in W.P.(C) No. 4009 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that inadvertently the statement was made before this court that to move before the appellate authority, however, in the writ petition, the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal was not under challenge, in view of that in para-10 of the order dated 29.08.2024, passed in W.P.(C) No. 4009 of 2023, the words ‘Appellate Authority’ may kindly be modified to ‘Appropriate Forum’. -2- 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent as well as learned counsel appearing for the Bank have got no serious objection in this regard. 5. In view of the above, let the ‘Appellate Authority’ be read as “Appropriate Forum” in para-10 of the order dated 29.08.2024, passed in W.P.(C) No. 4009 of 2023. 6. The aforesaid order is modified to the above extent. 7. This petition is disposed of as such. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-