RISHI RAM YADAV AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND ANOTHER
A482/9877/2024 · 2025-08-21
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25915 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25915 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145311 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9877 of 2024 Applicant :- Rishi Ram Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jalaj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Heard Sri Jalaj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri O. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 12.02.2019 as well cognizance
order dated 11.03.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bareilly, District Bareilly, in Case No.780 of 2019 (State of U.P. Vs. Vinod Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No.934 of 2018, under sections 406, 323, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly and entire proceeding of aforesaid case, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bareilly, District Bareilly, on the basis of compromise.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the
compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants.
6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the charge sheet dated 12.02.2019 as well cognizance order dated 11.03.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bareilly, District Bareilly, in Case No.780 of 2019 (State of U.P. Vs. Vinod Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No.934 of 2018, under sections 406, 323, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly and entie proceeding of aforesaid case, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bareilly, District Bareilly, are hereby quashed.
8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 22.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad