ROHIT HEMBROM ALIAS RAHUL HEMBROM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6251/2024 · 2025-05-08
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25904 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25904 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:13861 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6251 of 2024
1. Rohit Hembrom @ Rahul Hembrom, S/o Harish Hembrom
2. Renso Birua @ Lago, S/o Pator Birua. Both R/o Chhotaraikman, PO and PS Andhari, District West Singhbhum. …. Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Gupta, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, APP
-----
03/08.05.2025: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2.
This is an application filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners have been allegedly implicated in connection with Kumardungi PS Case No. 12 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under section 103(1), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chaibasa.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not named in the FIR and only on the basis of confessional statement of co- accused they have been implicated in this case.
4.
The learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
5.
Though the petitioners are not named in the FIR but from the case diary I find that petitioners have also taken part in assault of the deceased, as a result of which, the deceased died.
6.
Considering the statements of the witnesses and the first information report, I do not find this case fit for grant of anticipatory bail.
7.
Thus, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/