Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25901 (RAJ)

SMT. RAJKUMARI JAIN W/O SHRI RAMESH KUMAR JAIN v. SMT. POONAM

CCP/701/2024 · 2025-05-26

Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22036-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 701/2024 1. Smt. Rajkumari Jain W/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged About 62 Years, R/o B-137, Kirti Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Smt. Sobha Sharma W/o Shri Ganganarayan Sharma, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Tower No. 9, Plot No. G-1, Mangalam Ananda, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Smt. Premlata Sharma W/o Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Villa No. 25, Samanvya, Lata Nagar, Jhotwara, Kalwar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Smt. Munni Sharma W/o Shri Bhanu Prakash Sharma, Aged About 68 Years, R/o House No. 1978, Choutha Chouraha, Khajane Walon Ka Rasta, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Padma Goswami W/o Shri Hitlar Goswami, Aged About 68 Years, R/o House No. 89, Narayan Niwas, Jagdishpuri, Ganesh Nagar, Dhawas Road, Heerapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Neena Sharma W/o Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 68 Years, R/o 5, Sivad Area, Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Poonam, Secretary Department Of Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Vijay Pal Singh, Commissioner, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Shri Om Prakash Sharma, Secretary, Managing Committee Shri Khandal Vipra Samiti Kps (Uddan) Khandal Vipra Senior Secondary School, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:22036-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-701/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishwar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar with Ms. Pooja Dixit for Mr. Guru Charan Singh Gill,AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 26/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the petition, compliance has been made and no cause of action survives for pursuing the contempt petition. The contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /84