APHC010005292020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI / (Special Original Jurisdiction) f >>v Vx f ^ t ■•i ,\y / r? \o MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 461 OF 2020 ,*1/' Between: Goteti Bhaskar @Sai Krishna Bhaskar, S/o Goteti Rakesh aged about 29 Yrs. Hindu, Pvt. Employee, R/o H.No.23-23-20A, Kommuvari Street, Besides BSNL Office, Satyanaryanapuram, Vijayawada-520011 ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, A.P. Amaravathi Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Near PWD grounds, Vijayawada-5200 02 3. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District Machilipatnam- 521002. 4. The Inspector of police. Satyanarayanapuram P.S. Vijayawada- 520011. 5. Nandepu Tejasri, W/o Goteti Bhaskar H.No.73-3611-4, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada D/o Nandepu Jagadeesh, Vijayawada. Presently at Payakapuram, ...Respondents praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order direction declaring impugned action of the Respondents, particularly the Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or ^vRespondent No.4 subjecting the petitioner to assault and illtreatment and requiring the petitioner, his parents and others to attend to the police station at their choice without there being any complaint registered against the petitioners and without following the due process of law and consequently at the active influence of the 5th respondent and her father Nandepu Jagadish as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and grant lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to call for the presence of the petitioners or other family members to the Police station contrary to their civil and personal rights as guamteed under the indian constitution pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010005292020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 461/2020 Between: 1.GOTETI BHASKAR @SAI KRISHNA BHASKAR, S/0 GOTETI RAKESH AGED ABOUT 29 YRS. HINDU, PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/0 H.NO.23-23-20A, KOMMUVARI STREET, BESIDES BSNL OFFICE, SATYANARYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520011 ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, A.P. AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NEAR PWD GROUNDS, VIJAYAWADA-520002. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT MACHILIPATNAM-521002. SATYANARAYANAPURAM P.S. 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA-520011. D/O NANDEPU 5.NANDEPU TEJASRI, W/0 GOTETI BHASKAR H.NO.73-3611-4, PAYAKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. JAGADEESH, PRESENTLY AT SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring impugned action of the Respondents, particularly the Respondent No.4 subjecting the petitioner to assault and ill-treatment and requiring the petitioner, his parents and others to attend to the police station at their choice without there being any complaint registered against the petitioners and without following the due process of law and consequently at the active influence of the 5th respondent and her father Nandepu Jagadish as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and grant lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to call for the presence of the petitioners or otheir other family members to the Police station contrary to their civil and personal rights as guamteed under the indian constitution pending disposal of the main writ petition and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME(AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION NO: 461/2020 PRATAPA ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of the following prayer for: India with .. .pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring impugned action of the Respondents, particularly the Respondent No. 4 subjecting petitioner to assault and ill-treatment and requiring the petitioner, his parents and others to attend to the police station at their choice without there being any complaint registered against the petitioners and without following the due process of law and consequently at the active influence of the 5th respondent and her father Nandepu Jagadish as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural Justice and grant... ” the When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri Srinivasa Rao Pappu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous. 3. Sri M'd? Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 2. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \)^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. OneCCto Sri. Srinivasa Rao Pappu, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Home (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. AL HIGH COURT DATED:28/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 461 OF 2020 g 25S€P 2025 ^ Current Section m Co DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS