IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 896 of 2024 ---------- Bhagyamani Pathak, w/o. late Raj Kumar Pathak, r/o. House No. 13/2/1, Road No. 2, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, Dist. Saraikela-Kharsawan. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dr. Goutam Sutradhar, Director, National Insutitute of Technology, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, Dist. Jamshedpur …….. Opp. Parties. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : AC to AG Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate ---------- 05/ 09.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court has already been complied with and reasoned order to that effect has been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. However, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if at all aggrieved by the same. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal