IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- Cr.M.P. No. 3078 of 2024 ---- Pramila Kumari aged about 29 years wife of Abhimanyu Rajak resident of Village Laxmipur,PO and PS Kahalgaon District Bhagalpur, Bihar …… …. … Petitioner(s) -- Versus -- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Abhimanyu Rajak, son of late Arjun Rajak, resident of Village Laxmipur, PO and PS Kahalgaon, District Bhagalpur, Bihar …Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amrit Anunay, Advocate For the Opposite Party No.2.: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah,Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Advocate ---- 4/07.03.2025 This petition has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail of opposite party no.2 which was granted on 13.05.2024 passed in A.B.A. No.2186 of 2024 in connection with Meharma P.S. Case No.64 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.292 of 2023 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Godda. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after granting anticipatory bail Abhimanyu Rajak and others have threatened her and for that she has lodged the complaint before the Godda police station and in view of that the anticipatory bail granted to Abhimanyu Rajak may kindly be cancelled. 3. Learned counsel for the O.P.No.2 submits that no threat has been extended and the O.P.No.2 resides at Kahalgaon in the district of Bhagalpur whereas at present wife is residing in the district of Godda. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent State submits that on instruction the counter affidavit has been filed wherein the report has been annexed and it has come in the report that allegation made in the complaint was not true and on enquiry she has pointed out that threat was made on telephone and telephone number was also not provided . 5. In view of above, it is settled law that once the bail is granted in a routine way the bail cannot be cancelled unless the cogent reason is made out to cancel the bail. What has been discussed in the report annexed with the counter affidavit of the respondent State, no case of cancellation of anticipatory bail is made out, and as such, this petition is dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/