[2025:RJ-JP:1337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 220/2025 Rajkumar S/o Ramdayal, R/o Banota, Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Bohra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.179/2024 registered with the Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 365, 382, 336, 379, 323 & 143 of IPC. 2. Counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that co-accused namely; (1) Padmesh S/o Harimohan (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applicatin No.16097/2024), (2) Deena @ Dindayal S/o Shyokaran (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15465/2024), (3) Bablu @ Badal S/o Late Asharam (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13724/2024) & (4) Abhishek S/o Hira Lal (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12269/2024) have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide separate orders dated 19.12.2024, 09.12.2024, 07.11.2024 & 24.10.2024. [2025:RJ-JP:1337] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-220/2025] Counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2024 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made by counsel for the accused-petitioner. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner, so also the fact that the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and more particularly the fact that co-accused namely; (1) Padmesh S/o Harimohan (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applicatin No.16097/2024), (2) Deena @ Dindayal S/o Shyokaran (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15465/2024), (3) Bablu @ Badal S/o Late Asharam (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13724/2024) & (4) Abhishek S/o Hira Lal (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12269/2024) have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide separate orders dated 19.12.2024, 09.12.2024, 07.11.2024 & 24.10.2024, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees [2025:RJ-JP:1337] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-220/2025] One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /22