APHC010366592022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1400/2022 Between: 1. GUJJURU BALAJI,, S/O. KRISHNA RAO @ LODGE KRISHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. SRINIVASA NAGAR, 1ST LANE, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM.DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. RAVIVADA SURYAM DIED, RAVIVADA SURYAM (DIED) 2. RAVIVADA LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE SURYAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-404, BAPAREDDY COLONY, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 3. RAVIVADA REVATHI, D/O. LATE SURYAM, AGED ABOT 35 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-404, BAPAREDDY COLONY, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. RAVIVADA RENUKA, D/O. LATE SURYAM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-404, BAPAREDDY COLONY, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT . ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.1400 of 2022 Court may be pleased to beg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court against the orders passed in E.P.No. 28/2019 in 0.S.No.52/ 2015 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Tekkali IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.28/2019 in O.S. No.52/2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tekkali pursuant to the orders dt- 13.06.2022 pending disposal of the above CRP and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.1400 of 2022 The Court made the following order: When the matter was listed on 24.06.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. In that view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 17.07.2025 KGR