Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25880 (KAR)

SRI PRAKASH REDDY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15506/2018 · 2025-07-08

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24683 WP No. 15506 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 15506 OF 2018 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: SRI PRAKASH REDDY S/O. ANNAIAH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.47/1, REDDY COLONY, YAMALUR, BENGALURU-560 037. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENUGOPAL M S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU CITY DISTRICT, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24683 WP No. 15506 of 2018 K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 4. THE THASILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU. 5. 6. SRI. RAMALINGAPPA S/O. LATE MARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 1ST MAIN ROAD, YAMALUR, BENGALURU-560 037. SRI. B. SRINIVASAIAH S/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT NO.130, 3RD CROSS YAMALUR BENGALURU - 560 037. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR AGA FOR R1-R4; SRI. V. VISHWANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27.12.2017 BY WHICH IT WAS RECOMMENDED TO TAKE OVER THE SHREE CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE, YAMALUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24683 WP No. 15506 of 2018 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received no instructions to bring the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner on record. 2. The legal heirs of the deceased petitioner have not contacted him for doing so. 3. It appears that the legal heirs are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed as abated. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15