Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25878 (GAU)

IKBAL HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA AND 6 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1805/2025 · 2025-12-02

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010164412025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1805/2025 IKBAL HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA AND 6 ORS. S/O SAHIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA VILL- KUCHILA, GRANTH, P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR, P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 2: JAKIR HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA S/O SAHIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA VILL- KUCHILA GRANTH P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 3: SADIK HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA S/O SAHIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA VILL- KUCHILA GRANTH P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 4: JAHIR UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O KURSHED ALI MAZUMDAR VILL- KUCHILA GRANTH P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 5: FARUK AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O LT. BOSIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA Page No.# 2/3 VILL- CRPF CAMP ROAD NEAR AGRICULTURE FARM KUCHILA GRANTH P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 6: MOJIBUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA S/O LT. BOSIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA VILL- KUCHILA GRANTH P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 7: MD. ABDUL MALIK BARBHUIYA S/O KUTUB ALI BARBHUIYA VILL- KUCHILA GRANTH P.O. KUCHILA BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, MS A BEGUM,MS S R MAZARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 03.12.2025 Learned Counsel Mr. A.M.Barbhuiya is present for the petitioner and learned Addl.Public Prosecutor Mr. M.P. Goswami is present for the State respondent. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge sheet has been laid against the petitioners vide CS No.93/2025 dated 31.07.2025. 3. Petitioners are directed to appear before the jurisdictional Court/Eleka Magistrate within 20 (Twenty) days from today and apply for bail which may be considered by the learned court in accordance with law. 4. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken. 5. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant