Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25875 (AP)

GUBBALA JANAKI @ ILLLA JANAKI v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18903/2025 · 2025-08-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010365802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18903/2025 Between: 1. GUBBALA JANAKI @ ILLLA JANAKI, W/O. LATE. NAGESWARA RAO AGED 51 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 8/6/274, PLOT NO. 395, SRINIVASAPURAM COLONY, VANASTHALIPURAM, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DR. BR AMBEDAKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT AT AMALAPURAM, ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER SDPO, AMALAPURAM, DR. BR AMBEDAKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMALAPURAM RURAL POLICE STATION DR. BR AMBEDAKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. ILIA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. DARULANKA VILLAGE, AMALAPURAM 2 MANDAL, DR. BR AMBEDAKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents, particularly Respondent No. 5 and his subordinates at the instance of Respondent No. 6 in frequently interfering with my personal liberty and insisting the petitioner to deliver possession of petitioner's landed property of Ac. 1.25 Cents covered by R.S.No.240/3, R.S.No.85/20, R.S.No.69/11, R.S.No.72/1, R.S.No.59/4, R.S.No. 70/3 situated in Bandarulanka Village, Ambajipeta Sub-Registry, East Godavari District and also Residential Building having its D.No. 8/6/274, Plot No. 395, Srinivasapuram Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Rangareddy District, Telangana State, to Respondent in order to yield to the terms of 6th Respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents particularly 5th Respondent and his subordinates not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's possession over her said properties and personal liberty and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18903/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents, particularly Respondent No. 5 and his subordinates at the instance of Respondent No. 6 in frequently interfering with my personal liberty and insisting the petitioner to deliver possession of petitioner's landed property of Ac. 1.25 Cents covered by R.S.No.240/3, R.S.No.85/20, R.S.No.69/11, R.S.No.72/1, R.S.No.59/4, R.S.No.70/3 situated in Bandarulanka Village, Ambajipeta Sub-Registry, East Godavari District and also Residential Building having its D.No.8/6/274, Plot No. 395, Srinivasapuram Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Rangareddy District, Telangana State, to Respondent in order to yield to the terms of 6th Respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents particularly 5th Respondent and his subordinates not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's possession over her said properties and personal liberty and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that a crime has been registered against the petitioner in Cr.No.70 of 2025. The petitioner was called to the police station for preliminary enquiry. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18903 of 2025 Dated.05.08.2025 UPS 86