1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A No. 591 of 2018 -------- 1. Nanki Devi, Aged about 58 years, wife of Bhuvneshwar Yadav 2. Bausli Mahto, Aged about 58 years, 3. Devan Mahto, Aged about 55 years, Sl. No. 2 & 3 sons of Ramashish Mahto 4. Bhola Mahto, Husband of Janki Mahto, Aged about 75 years, 5. Rita Kumari @ Rita Kuwar, Aged about 35 years, Widow of Late Munna Kumar, Daughter of Bhola Mahto 6. Sachin Kumar, Aged about 10 years, Son of Late Munna Kumar, represented through his mother Rita Kumari 7. Rajesh Mahto, Aged about 37 years, Son of Bhola Mahto 8. Bhagwan Mahto @ Sri Bhagwan Mahto, Aged about 37 years, Son of Bhola Mahto, 9. Sigashan Mahto, Aged about 48 years, Son of Bhola Mahto 10. Lilawati Devi, Aged about 75 years, wife of Krishna Mahto All residents of C/o Gajadhar Mahto, Mecon Colony, P.O. & P.S Doranda, District: Ranchi. … … Appellants Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mohan Mahto, Son of Late Ganju Mahto 3. Most. Tetri Devi, Widow of Late Chhedi Mahto 4. Smt. Shobha Devi, Wife of Mohan Mahto 5. Pancham Mahto 6. Anil Mahto Sl. No. 5 & 6 sons of Late Chhedi Mahto All residents of Village: Dungri, Chapa Toli, P.O. & P.S.: Hatia, District: Ranchi. 7. Satya Narayan Lal, Son of Late Gandouri Sahu, resident of Plaza Road, P.O. & P.S. Lalpur, District: Ranchi. … … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Appellants : Mr. R. R. Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mrs. Darshana Poddar Mishra, AAG-I For the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6: Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate -------- 08/Dated: 19.02.2025 1. Since the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge remands the matter to the revisional authority to consider the aspect as to whether the appellants are the adjoining raiyats of the property involved in this case, we see no reason to interfere with the 2 said order. 2. Accordingly, this Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. 3. Pending I.A, if any, also stands disposed of. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit/Vedanti