[2025:RJ-JP:29247] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 348/2025 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2724/2025 Kishan Singh Dhakad S/o Shri Vijendra Singh Dhakad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Bagaur, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli. At Present Tenant At Plot No. 75, Dinesh Sharma Ka Makan, Ramnagar 17-A, Khora Bisal, Jaipur, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajbeer Singh Gurjar, Adv. Ms. Seema Shekhar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 31/07/2025 1. Matter comes up on an application No.348/2025 praying that the condition of furnishing of two attested solvent sureties imposed vide order dated 26.05.2025 passed by this Court in Bail Application of the accused-applicant- Kishan Singh Dhakad may be modified. Vide order dated 26.05.2025, the accused-applicant was ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:29247] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-348/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant is unable to furnish attested sureties, therefore, he could not be released on bail despite granting bail vide order dated 26.05.2025. Therefore, the condition of imposing of two attested solvent sureties may modified to two solvent sureties. 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate opposes the prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-applicant. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the order passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2724/2025 is modified to the extent that the accused-applicant shall furnish two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each instead of two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. However, it is made clear that out of the two solvent sureties, one shall be a family member of the accused-applicant and rest of the condition shall remain same. 5. Hence, the application is allowed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Tanisha /9