Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2586 (AP)

CH. SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/406/2025 · 2025-01-22

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010005312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 406/2025 Between: 1. CH. SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. MIG -I, PLOT NO.38, SECTOR-2, D.NO.1-67-30, M.V.P. COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. A.P. 2. P.V. MOHAN RAO, S/O. RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.37, SECTOR-2, M.V.P. COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. A.P. 3. GUNTA SAI RAMANI, W/O. B. SHIVA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUTY EARS, OCC HOUSE MAKER R/O. KERLAMPUDI LAYOUT, CHINNA WALTAIR, D.NO.7-22-22, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. A.P. . 4. B. KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O. SAMBHASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC HOUSE MAKER, R/O. M.V.P. COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. A.P ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM 2 DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RANASTHALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G TUHIN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Kranthi Kiran, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri G. Tuhin Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, Land Acquisition, Stamps & Registration. 2. Sri Kranthi Kiran, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri G. Tuhin Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no Order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 22.01.2025 JKS 3 62 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 406 OF 2025 22.01.2025 JKS