Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39756 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2749 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harihar Singh Respondent :- Indian Telephone Industries Limited And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishabh Kumar Pandey,Vinay Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dinesh Kumar Rai,Sudarshan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Rishabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Dinesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4 and Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.5. 2. Sri Dinesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4 provided a document that the grievance of the petitioner i.e. payment of gratuity, provident fund and privilege leave encashment is being provided. 3. Sri Rishabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of the documents has not disputed the aforesaid submission. However, he further submits that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, a liberty be granted to him to take available legal remedy. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, since it appears that the prayer of the petitioner is being substantially addressed, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, reserving a liberty to the petitioner that in case he is still aggrieved, he can avail available legal remedy. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad