Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25845 (KAR)

PILLAPPA v. SRI POOJARI MADHUVAPPA

WP/4537/2021 · 2025-02-17

R Nataraj

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7033 WP No. 4537 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 4537 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: PILLAPPA S/O. LATE MUNINARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURIST, R/O. KURUBARA PETE, SIDLAGHATTA TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562105 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. POOJARI MADHUVAPPA S/O. POOJARI MUNINARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. K.K. PETE, BEHIND YALLAMMA TEMPLE, SIDLAGHATTA TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562105. 2. SMT. MUNILAKSHMAMMA W/O. POOJARI MADHUVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O:K.K. PETE, BEHIND YALLAMMA TEMPLE, SIDLAGHATTA TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562105. 3. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BANUMAKALAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST-562122 Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7033 WP No. 4537 of 2021 4. SRI. RAMESHA S/O. LATE NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. BANUMAKALAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST-562122 5. SRI. SRIRAMA S/O. LATE UTHANALLAPPA, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT DIBBURAHALLI VILLAGE, SADALI HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DIST-562105 6. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. SRIRAMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT DIBBURAHALLI VILLAGE, SADALI HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DIST-562105 7. SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O. SRIRAMA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT DIBBURAHALLI VILLAGE, SADALI HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DIST-562105 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. SEENAPPA AND C.S. VINOD, ADVOCATES FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.06.2020 PASSED IN IA NO.8 IN O.S.NO.184/2009 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA, THE COPY OF WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7033 WP No. 4537 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Notice was issued by this Court on 12.07.2022. This Court in terms of the order dated 27.07.2021 had directed the petitioner to furnish requisites for issuance of notice to respondents. 3. Since process is not paid and hand summons is not taken, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6