SHRI. KIRAN KUMAR v. THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO OPEARATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
CRP/388/2025 · 2025-07-10
M Nagaprasanna
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25844 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25844 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17927 WP No. 13291 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13291 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. KIRAN KUMAR S/O SMT H M SUJATHA AND SHRI G S SHIVA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS DODDAMANE FARM HOUSE IN SY.NO 34,35,38 AND 39 GURUDAHALLI VILLAGE TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/AT NO 1065, 6TH MAIN ROAD 3RD STAGE, 3RD BLOCK WEST OF CORD ROAD BASAVESHWARANGAR BENGALURU 79 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO OPEARATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO 7/2”SURYA CHAMBERS” 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU 560020 REP BY ITS SECRETARY.
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17927 WP No. 13291 of 2025
2. THE PRESIDENT THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSING BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO 7/2,”SURYA CHAMBERS” 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU 560020.
3. SRI H N LAKSHMANA MURTHY S/O SHRI H C NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT 318, GROUND FLOOR 2ND G CROSS, 3RD BLOCK 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGAR WEST OF CORD ROAD BENGALURU 560079. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE VI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY (CCH -11), IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 19/2024, DATED 09/04/2025, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17927 WP No. 13291 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petitioner may be permitted to convert this petition to Civil Revision Petition.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to convert this petition to Civil Revision Petition.
4. For statistical purpose, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8